<html>
<head><meta charset="utf-8"><title>blog post, managing RFC discussion · wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc · Zulip Chat Archive</title></head>
<h2>Stream: <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/249502-wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc/index.html">wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc</a></h2>
<h3>Topic: <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/249502-wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc/topic/blog.20post.2C.20managing.20RFC.20discussion.html">blog post, managing RFC discussion</a></h3>

<hr>

<base href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com">

<head><link href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/style.css" rel="stylesheet"></head>

<a name="208351572"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/249502-wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc/topic/blog%20post%2C%20managing%20RFC%20discussion/near/208351572" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> nikomatsakis <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/249502-wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc/topic/blog.20post.2C.20managing.20RFC.20discussion.html#208351572">(Aug 28 2020 at 14:45)</a>:</h4>
<p>On a related note, while I'm dumping out mental context, I was talking to <span class="user-mention" data-user-id="225192">@Nell Shamrell-Harrington</span> about possibly writing up a blog post kind of announcing that we are really close to an RFC here, covering some of the major points, and linking to the lang-team design meeting recordings/minutes. I sketched out a possible summary <a href="https://hackmd.io/DKMtWm7KQ36IPjDxA9G95A">here</a>, though re-reading it now I wonder if the focus couldn't be a bit different (i.e, not so much about lang-team <em>meeting</em> as about making sure people know what's coming up.)</p>



<a name="208351664"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/249502-wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc/topic/blog%20post%2C%20managing%20RFC%20discussion/near/208351664" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> nikomatsakis <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/249502-wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc/topic/blog.20post.2C.20managing.20RFC.20discussion.html#208351664">(Aug 28 2020 at 14:46)</a>:</h4>
<p>I think when we open the RFC, discussions can sometimes move quickly -- I don't expect a ton of controversy here, but it'd be good for us to think about who'll be around to answer questions, how long we expect to leave RFC open.</p>



<a name="208361210"></a>
<h4><a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com#narrow/stream/249502-wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc/topic/blog%20post%2C%20managing%20RFC%20discussion/near/208361210" class="zl"><img src="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/assets/img/zulip.svg" alt="view this post on Zulip" style="width:20px;height:20px;"></a> Yoshua Wuyts <a href="https://rust-lang.github.io/zulip_archive/stream/249502-wg-async-foundations/stream-trait-rfc/topic/blog.20post.2C.20managing.20RFC.20discussion.html#208361210">(Aug 28 2020 at 15:57)</a>:</h4>
<p>A blog post would be great! -- I think 3 weeks of having the RFC open would be reasonable? Provides a hard stop for discussion to stop before the teams take over -- but not too short that people will feel like they missed the opportunity to engage.</p>



<hr><p>Last updated: Aug 07 2021 at 22:04 UTC</p>
</html>